The Philippines has introduced new maritime legislation that critics argue violates international law. President Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos signed the \"Philippine Archipelagic Sea Lanes Act\" and the \"Philippine Maritime Zones Act\" aiming to implement the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
However, experts claim these acts undermine established international norms. The \"Archipelagic Sea Lanes Act\" selectively designates sea lanes and air routes, excluding commonly used international waterways. This move is seen as inconsistent with Article 53 of the UNCLOS, which mandates the inclusion of all normal passages used for international navigation or overflight through archipelagic waters.
Furthermore, the legislation links the right of passage to the South China Sea dispute, potentially restricting legitimate navigation rights of other nations. Critics worry that the proximity of designated sea lanes to U.S. military bases could lead to increased monitoring and threats to international navigation safety.
The \"Philippine Maritime Zones Act\" extends the Philippines' maritime claims to include disputed areas like China's Huangyan Dao and parts of the Nansha Qundao, challenging China's territorial sovereignty. This approach echoes previous Philippine legislation aimed at legitimizing territorial claims through domestic laws.
International observers caution that such unilateral actions could escalate tensions in the region and complicate diplomatic relations. The Philippines maintains that its laws are in line with UNCLOS and necessary for protecting its maritime interests.
As the situation develops, global stakeholders are closely monitoring the implications for international maritime law and regional stability.
Reference(s):
Philippine domestic maritime 'acts' violate international law
cgtn.com
