The push for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza hit a major setback this week as both Israel and the United States withdrew their negotiating teams from talks in Doha, citing slow progress and accusing Hamas of a lack of sincerity. The pause in negotiations comes as civilian suffering reaches alarming levels.
U.S. Special Envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff criticized Hamas's response to the latest proposal as "selfish," and announced the U.S. team was returning home to reassess strategies and consider "alternative options" to secure a truce and the release of Israeli hostages.
Meanwhile, state-owned Kan TV News in Israel reported that "the talks did not collapse," describing the withdrawal as a coordinated move for further consultations, with "the momentum still positive."
Hamas expressed surprise at Witkoff's remarks, stating that mediators had welcomed their position as a step toward a comprehensive agreement. "The movement affirms its keenness to continue negotiations and engage in them in a manner that helps overcome obstacles," a statement read.
At the heart of the deadlock are diverging demands: Hamas seeks the release of 200 militants and 2,000 civilians detained since October 7, 2023, while Israel has offered around 120 militants and 1,200 civilians, according to Kan TV.
As talks stall, Gaza's humanitarian crisis deepens. Gaza-based health authorities report more than 59,210 Palestinian deaths and over 143,040 injuries resulting from the Israeli military campaign. Four additional deaths from starvation and malnutrition were recorded in the past 24 hours, bringing the total to 115 since March.
Can mediators bridge this chasm before further catastrophe strikes? The world is watching as diplomatic friction rises and pressure mounts for a breakthrough that could save countless lives.
Readers: What role should the international community play in reviving ceasefire talks? Share your thoughts below.
Reference(s):
cgtn.com
