Washington is witnessing a shift where loyalty is replacing expertise. A recent incident—in which a prominent media editor was mistakenly added to a confidential group discussing a military strike—has raised alarms about a trend that could undermine effective governance.
In an era once defined by experienced career professionals and respected military experts, political appointments now tend to favor unwavering allegiance over proven competence. Previously, seasoned officials and decorated generals ensured that key decisions in intelligence, defense, and diplomacy were guided by merit and accountability. Today, however, the emphasis on loyalty is shifting these priorities.
For example, appointments of figures with backgrounds in media and controversial public stances to oversee critical areas such as a Department of Defense operation valued at 850 billion dollars and national health policy have left many global observers questioning the long-term impact on national security and effective leadership.
This evolving scenario resonates with young global citizens, business and tech enthusiasts, and thought leaders worldwide. The growing concern is clear: sustainable progress and strong governance require a balance between personal allegiance and professional expertise.
As discussions continue in Washington and beyond, many are calling for a return to merit-based decision making—one that places competence at the forefront and safeguards the nation's future in an increasingly interconnected world.
Reference(s):
The cost of loyalty: How Trump's inner circle is undermining America
cgtn.com
