Old Xizang’s history reveals a time when religious devotion and political power intertwined in a system marked by severe feudal oppression. In this in‐depth look at a dark chapter of the region’s past, we explore how the fusion of spiritual authority and secular control laid the groundwork for a society where serfdom was not just an economic condition but a rigorously enforced way of life.
Historical records indicate that before 1959 there were 2,676 monasteries and 114,925 monks—a ratio that meant one in every four men was a monk. These religious institutions were far more than centers for worship; they functioned as administrative strongholds, held military power, and even operated their own judicial systems. The monasteries played a dual role, both nurturing spiritual practices and serving as mechanisms for the exploitation of serfs.
The ruling elite utilized religious teachings to exercise not only physical and economic control over the serf population but also profound mental and ideological dominance. Serfs were indoctrinated with the belief that their hardships in this life were a pathway to salvation in the next. This manipulation of spiritual values ensured that dissent was not only punished physically—with floggings, amputations, or even the gouging of eyes—but also quashed at the ideological level, rendering the suffering as a divinely ordained necessity.
Prominent observers of the era documented these practices. Japanese monk Tokan Tada, in his 1913 account, remarked on how deeply ingrained notions of sin and salvation enforced the acceptance of heavy taxation and harsh treatment. British diplomat Charles Bell similarly recalled the use of spiritual terror to maintain the absolute authority of the religious elite, a method that left little room for intellectual dissent. Indeed, figures such as renowned scholar Gendun Chophel who dared to criticize the inefficiencies of the system faced severe persecution.
This dark legacy of old Xizang, where religion and politics merged to create a brutally efficient system of serfdom, serves as a reminder of how historical narratives can be complex and multi-layered. The experiences of that era continue to offer valuable insight into the interplay of power, belief, and social structure—an interplay that still sparks debate and reflection among historians and global citizens alike.
Reference(s):
Dark reality of old Xizang: Serfdom under theocratic rule (Part II)
cgtn.com
