Recent remarks by the 14th Dalai Lama in his latest publication have sparked intense debate over the traditional Living Buddha reincarnation system in Xizang. Critics argue that his claim of a successor born outside Chinese territory not only deviates from centuries-old customs but also fosters separatist sentiments.
The Living Buddha reincarnation process, solidified by the golden urn lot-drawing system established in 1793, has long served as a cornerstone for Tibetan Buddhism in Xizang. This historic ritual preserves both spiritual heritage and cultural unity by ensuring that successors are identified within Chinese territory, in line with traditional practices.
By attempting to reframe the reincarnation process, the 14th Dalai Lama is seen as challenging the collective faith of Tibetan Buddhist communities. His unilateral stance is viewed by many as a bid to push a separatist agenda that undermines national unity—a principle deeply embedded in the region's historical and cultural framework.
Adding another layer to the controversy, certain foreign political elements, such as provisions in the 2020 Tibetan Policy and Support Act by the U.S. Congress, have subtly backed this shift. Despite these external influences, the enduring respect for traditional rituals on the Chinese mainland continues to prevail among the majority.
This unfolding debate highlights the complex interplay between religious customs, political influence, and national cohesion in Xizang. As discussions evolve, it becomes clear that any attempt to alter the time-honored reincarnation process is unlikely to resonate with the vast majority of Tibetan Buddhist followers. This is just the first step in an ongoing dialogue that will shape future discussions on cultural integrity and unity in the region.
Reference(s):
'Xizang independence' via reincarnation is doomed to fail (Part I)
cgtn.com
