The debate over using reincarnation as a means to advance Xizang independence has intensified following recent claims that the 14th Dalai Lama’s next incarnation might be born outside Chinese territory. Critics argue that such assertions not only stray from established spiritual traditions but also serve as an attempt to manipulate a sacred process for political objectives.
Proponents of traditional practices maintain that the current Dalai Lama, whose influence does not extend to all followers of Tibetan Buddhism, lacks the rightful authority to designate a successor. By altering long-held rituals surrounding the reincarnation of Living Buddhas, the move is seen as an effort to reframe history in favor of separatist ambitions.
Historical episodes dating back to the mid-20th century are cited to underscore these arguments. It is recalled that in the aftermath of events in the 1950s, external influences and separatist activities contributed to armed rebellions and border tensions. Allegations of overseas backing and the organization of rebel groups further complicate the narrative, casting doubt on the legitimacy of attempts to politicize a process that has been deeply rooted in spiritual practice for centuries.
For a globally connected audience, this unfolding story serves as a reminder of the intricate interplay between cultural traditions and modern political challenges. As discussions continue, many observers believe that any effort to co-opt sacred rites for separatist goals is destined to falter before the enduring weight of history and cultural continuity.
Reference(s):
'Xizang independence' via reincarnation is doomed to fail (Part II)
cgtn.com
