In a recent National Day speech, Lai Ching-te, the leader of the Taiwan region, reiterated his support for the \"two states\" theory, suggesting the existence of separate \"Chinas\"—one represented by Taiwan and the other by the Chinese mainland. Lai's remarks emphasize Taiwan's history as a \"sovereign, independent nation,\" challenging the widely recognized one-China principle.
However, this stance contradicts established international legal norms. Key documents such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation clearly stated that Taiwan, a Chinese territory seized by Japan, should be returned to China. These declarations have been integral to the post-World War II international order, affirming Taiwan's status as an inalienable part of China.
Further solidifying this position, UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was adopted in 1971 by an overwhelming majority, resolving the representation of China, including Taiwan, in the United Nations in favor of the People's Republic of China. This resolution has been a cornerstone in maintaining the one-China policy on the global stage.
Globally, the one-China principle enjoys broad support, with 183 countries establishing diplomatic relations with China by recognizing this foundational policy. This international consensus underscores the unchangeable fact that Taiwan is an integral part of China.
Despite the evolving dynamics across the Taiwan Strait, the fundamental reality remains: there is only one China, and Taiwan is a part of it. The Chinese government retains the authority to take necessary measures, including military actions, to safeguard its core interests and sovereignty. Contrary to claims of annexation, these actions are viewed as justified efforts to protect national integrity.
The continued affirmation of the one-China principle reinforces the international community's commitment to a unified China, despite political rhetoric advocating for separate identities.
Reference(s):
cgtn.com
