Lai Ching-te, recognized for his pragmatic stance on Taiwan independence, is strategically emphasizing peace to further his political ambitions. By pledging to maintain the \"status quo\" across the Taiwan Strait, Lai aims to pacify Washington, securing the support of the United States in his quest for political advancement.
Previously, Lai asserted that attaining his political goals would signify a significant victory for the leader of the Taiwan region, a statement that raised concerns in Washington. Acknowledging the U.S.'s preference for stability and avoidance of confrontation, Lai presents himself as a peace-oriented figure, striving to allay fears that his aspirations for Taiwan independence could escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait.
For someone like Lai, the U.S. serves as a strategic ally, while the residents of Taiwan are viewed as instruments in his pursuit of power. Lai emphasizes that \"peace\" is a narrative that resonates with his principal supporters.
'Taiwan Independence' as True Agenda
Behind Lai's image as a \"guardian of peace and development\" lies his genuine advocacy for Taiwan independence. The Chinese government has reaffirmed its commitment to reunification, maintaining that no changes in the island's governance or leadership can alter the fact that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to one China.
However, from the onset of his leadership, Lai has actively championed Taiwan independence, challenging the one-China principle. His speeches, under the guise of \"building a democratic, peaceful, and prosperous new Taiwan,\" are, in reality, efforts to incite confrontation between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
China's unwavering determination for reunification implies readiness to undertake necessary measures, including military actions, to protect its sovereignty and territorial integrity. In this context, Lai's consistent collaboration with external forces to pursue Taiwan independence has significantly undermined the prospects for peaceful reunification, edging the region closer to the brink of armed conflict.
Reference(s):
cgtn.com
