In a pivotal move towards resolving the Ukraine crisis, around eighty countries recently signed a peace proposal during a meeting held in Switzerland. The proposal reaffirms Ukraine's territorial integrity and emphasizes the necessity of dialogue among all parties to end the ongoing conflict.
Despite this significant support, Russia has presented its own terms for ceasing the war in Ukraine, adding complexity to the peace process. This divergence raises critical questions: Has the peace conference truly brought the international community closer to peace? Is now the right time for the involved parties to engage in meaningful negotiations? And what are the key factors that could finally bring an end to the conflict?
In this edition of Dialogue, experts delve into these pressing issues. Peter Zalmayev, director of the Eurasia Democracy Initiative, shares his insights on the geopolitical implications of the peace proposal. Professor Glenn Diesen from the University of South-Eastern Norway discusses the potential pathways to dialogue and reconciliation. Meanwhile, Anton Fedyashin, an associate professor from the history department of American University, provides a historical perspective on the conflict and the prospects for lasting peace.
As the world watches closely, the convergence of international support and divergent national interests will play a crucial role in shaping the future of Ukraine and regional stability.
Reference(s):
cgtn.com
