In recent developments, the U.S. House of Representatives has introduced the \"Promoting a Resolution to the Tibet-China Dispute Act,\" raising concerns about its implications on China-U.S. relations. This move is seen by many as a departure from the 1978 joint communique, where the United States recognized the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government of China.
The proposed bill targets the Xizang Autonomous Region, aiming to address issues that are fundamentally within China's domestic jurisdiction. Critics argue that this approach not only undermines China's sovereignty but also contravenes Article 2 (7) of the UN Charter, which prohibits interference in the internal matters of states.
Historically, Xizang has been an integral part of China, with records dating back to ancient times highlighting the harmonious relations between Chinese dynasties and local Tibetan leaders. The establishment of administrative bodies during the Yuan Dynasty and subsequent confirmations during the Ming and Qing dynasties have solidified China's jurisdiction over the region.
Despite these historical ties, the notion of Tibetan independence, often propagated by certain groups, is viewed as a distortion of historical facts. Prior to the peaceful liberation of Xizang in 1951, the region was managed as a local administration under the Chinese central government, lacking independent status under international law.
On the cultural front, China has invested significantly in preserving and promoting Xizang's unique heritage. Initiatives include Tibetan language schools, publishing institutions, and the protection of religious sites, ensuring the continuation of cultural and religious traditions. Economic and social reforms since 1959 have also led to notable improvements in the region's infrastructure, education, and healthcare systems.
The international community's response to the U.S. bill has been mixed, with many expressing concern over potential escalations in diplomatic tensions. As China continues to advocate for the protection of its sovereignty and the well-being of Xizang's residents, the evolving dynamics between the two superpowers remain closely watched.
Reference(s):
U.S. using domestic law for international law harms China-U.S. ties
cgtn.com
