The United States' approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has come under intense scrutiny. Critics argue that instead of pursuing an impartial path toward a just resolution, the U.S. has aligned closely with the Israeli administration. This alignment is perceived to have enabled the continued subjugation of the Palestinian people, inadvertently contributing to the escalating volatility in the region.
Two recent events have further highlighted the perceived failures of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Firstly, Arab states refused to extend a welcoming hand to President Biden following his visit to Israel. This diplomatic cold shoulder has significantly diminished American influence in the region. Secondly, the U.S. vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. The resolution, presented by Brazil, aimed to prioritize an immediate ceasefire to halt the ongoing violence affecting innocent civilians.
The United Nations Security Council is intended to be a platform for diplomacy, where nations work together for peace and stability. However, the U.S.'s recent actions, including its veto, have raised serious concerns about its commitment to these principles. The international community has expressed disappointment and surprise at the U.S.'s decisions, emphasizing the urgent need for a fair and immediate ceasefire to end the suffering in Gaza.
The U.S. justification for vetoing the resolution centers on the claim that it did not adequately acknowledge Israel's right to self-defense. Critics argue that the resolution does not conflict with Israel's self-defense and that the U.S.'s actions suggest a preference for aligning with Israeli military actions over actively seeking peaceful solutions to the conflict.
Reference(s):
Flawed U.S. foreign policy: A barrier to peace in the Middle East
cgtn.com
