Newly disclosed Pentagon documents confirm what critics have long alleged: The U.S. military’s global drone strike campaigns relied on "deeply flawed intelligence," resulting in over 1,000 civilian deaths over the past decade, The New York Times reports. Despite this, not a single U.S. military official has faced charges or disciplinary action, leaving victims’ families without recourse.
The Human Cost of Remote Warfare
Brandon Bryant, a former U.S. Air Force drone operator, offers a chilling firsthand account. After enlisting in 2005, he participated in hundreds of lethal strikes across Afghanistan, Iraq, and Africa. "We were told we were surgical," Bryant recalls. "But the reality was chaos—misidentified targets, children caught in blast zones, and a system that never admitted mistakes."
"There’s no justice for the families we destroyed. The military just moves on."
Bryant, honorably discharged in 2011, now suffers from severe PTSD and advocates for accountability. His testimony aligns with leaked reports showing systemic failures in target verification and post-strike investigations, with civilian deaths often dismissed as "enemy casualties."
A Global Call for Transparency
While the U.S. claims drone strikes "minimize civilian harm," data paints a darker picture. Advocacy groups estimate actual casualties may be 5x higher than official counts. Legal experts argue the lack of repercussions violates international law, sparking demands for independent oversight and reparations for affected communities.
Reference(s):
Who is responsible for civilian casualties in U.S. drone operations?
cgtn.com
