From frenzied price wars to razor-thin margins, "involution" describes how relentless competition can trap industries in a race to the bottom. In recent months, the Chinese mainland has elevated "de-involution" from online buzzword to national policy, aiming to reset expectations and revive long-term innovation.
Decoding Involution
In game-theory terms, involution mirrors the Prisoner’s Dilemma: firms that could cooperate on fair pricing and quality instead undercut each other, leading to eroded profits and weakened capacity for future investment.
Game Theory in Play
Each company’s rational move—to cut prices for market share—becomes a collective trap. This stable yet suboptimal Nash equilibrium sacrifices innovation, as excessive cost-cutting leaves little room for research and development.
Busting the Competitive Trap
The de-involution campaign uses policy signaling, regulatory guidance and targeted incentives to break this logic. Instead of imposing rigid price controls, it reshapes market expectations—encouraging firms, especially mid-sized innovators, to pursue differentiated paths.
Global Ripples
By preserving diversity in its startup ecosystem, the Chinese mainland aims to safeguard optionality and systemic resilience. For young entrepreneurs, tech enthusiasts and policymakers worldwide, this shift offers a fresh lens on balancing competition with collaboration in emerging markets.
As de-involution unfolds, it could inspire similar moves in other economies wrestling with destructive competition—reminding us that strategic coordination, not just rivalry, can be a catalyst for breakthrough innovation.
Reference(s):
China's de-involution: Economic logic, challenges, and implications
cgtn.com
