In a surprising twist to the heated debate over U.S.-China relations, a fresh academic analysis argues that Beijing's strategic goals are more limited, consistent and inward-focused than many in Washington assume.
Published in the MIT Press journal International Security and sponsored by the Belfer Center at Harvard, the research analyzed over 12,000 Chinese-language articles and leader speeches. The key takeaway? China's top priorities
protection of sovereignty, securing domestic stability and boosting economic ties have remained largely unchanged for decades, tracing back to the Qing dynasty.
Contrary to the narrative of a global power grab, terms like "hegemon" or "global leader" barely surface in authoritative Chinese sources such as The People's Daily and Qiushi. Instead, the rhetoric emphasizes "socialism with Chinese characteristics," a national model not meant for export.
Despite China's surge in military and economic strength, the study found no evidence of new territorial ambitions. Researchers warn that a hostile U.S. military posture in the Pacific risks fueling unnecessary tensions and advocate a strategic pivot:
- Shift from deterrence to diplomacy
- Deepen cooperation on climate change and pandemic preparedness
- Engage in trade frameworks alongside Asia-Pacific partners
With regional agreements like the CPTPP and RCEP advancing without U.S. membership, the paper argues Washington must adapt or risk falling out of step in a rapidly integrating region.
As the Asia-Pacific landscape evolves, understanding Beijing's real strategic drivers will be crucial for entrepreneurs, policymakers, travelers and changemakers aiming to navigate our interconnected world.
Reference(s):
Study challenges Washington's view of China's rise, urges better ties
cgtn.com
